Hi, my name is
Vanessa Escobar. I am a third year Sociology major.
In Out of the
House, the Halo, and the Whore’s Mask, Chicana artists faced struggles of dealing with the dominance of
Chicanismo. Chicana’s were underrepresented as artists by Chicano artists and
their artwork in art exhibitions. Chicana’s were portrayed as submissive and
seen as an object of procreation to maintain the ideology of “la familia”. My
question for this part of the essay is, how difficult was it to display Esther Hernandez and Yolanda Lopez unique art of the Virgin Mary, who depicts a different view of religious beliefs than those that see La Virgen De Guadalupe as a form of respect and therefore,
changing her image, could have been seen as disrespectful? Changing her image
might have been a challenge, but also, it is important for individuals to have
a different view outside religious beliefs.
In There’s no Place like Aztlan: Embodied Aesthetics in Chicana Art,
Aztlan is seen as the homeland of Chicanos/as, yet dominated by Chicanos
that have the notion that Aztlan in a “motherland” in where women are seen as
pure and virgins and males are seen as a process brotherhood that will serve as
powerful tools to defeat the gabacho problem. This is a form of gender division
in where the women is used as an object and not seen as capable to contribute
to the Chicano Movement. Will the notion that women are objects to procreate
and sexually satisfy their male partner ever change? The more individuals get
educated through essays like these can change the mentality in how society
expect women to behave, but also, there will be those individuals that will not
change their beliefs and continue to practice gender inequality.
No comments:
Post a Comment