Hello, my name is Nina Friedman, I am a fourth year World
Arts and Cultures major and Education Studies minor.
Much of what I took away from Out of the House, the Halo, and the Whore’s Mask: The Mirror of
Malinchismo was the way in which Gaspar de Alba categorized the Chicana
movement within the context of the feminist movement. Throughout the piece
Gaspar de Alba emphasized the division between men and women in a movement of
identity politics, a movement consisting of members seeking to rid themselves
from varying forces of oppression. She spoke intimately about issues within
this movement, particularly issues of being a woman in both the art world and the
world in general. She states, “to privilege gender over class and race is to
perpetuate racism and ruling class values. To ignore gender, however, in the
struggle for civil and human rights is to perpetuate the objectification and
abuse of women.” My question for Gaspar de Alba is how do you navigate multiple
subordinate identities? How do you balance addressing issues of sexism, racism,
and classism in a larger struggle for empowerment?
Other questions:
Does being a malinche still denote a negative context?
How have Chicana feminists reclaimed or redefined la
malinche as a force of empowerment?
No comments:
Post a Comment