Hi everyone, my name is Andres
Valles and I’m studying political science with a concentration in international
relation focusing on the Meddle East. I plan to seek employment with the FBI in
the near future, possible after receiving my Ph.D in the subject. This is my
last quarter at UCLA and I have the opportunity to take this chicano/a class. I
gravitated to this particular class because I’ve always wanted to enroll in at
least one chicano/a class before leaving UCLA and this was the perfect class for
me because its dealing with art. I’ve been drawling and painting since I was a
kid, but I haven’t painting anything recently. I hope this class will
rejuvenate some preexisting drive in painting, a drive that I once held inside
of me.
Out of the house, the Halo, and the whore’s Mask: My first thoughts
after reading the essay clearly demonstrate the constant struggle of chicana
artist to receive recognition in the art community? Has this inequality and
unjust alienation of chicana art work continue now? However, did Yolanda M.
Lopez portrait of the artist as the virgin of Guadalupe come with some
surrounding controversy, and if so, did that prevent her work from getting the
attention she should have received?
There’s no place like Aztlan:
Ebodied Aesthetics in Chicana: the legendary ancestral home of the Aztec people
is depicted in the Aztlan as a paradise, but other scholars like Aubin Codex
paint a more ominous place, a place governed by tyrannical rule, guided by
their priest. Alicia Gaspar de Alba shows that chicano/a don’t feel at home in United
States but they also don’t feel at home in Mexico. Like the contradictory image
of Aztlan, could chicnao/a be searching for something that really doesn’t exist
and could only reside in oneself?
No comments:
Post a Comment