Before I
go into the definition of Rasquachismo, let me tell you what I know about the term
Rasquachi, in general. Rasquachi became a popular character archetype seen on
tv and in theater. These Rasquachi characters were known as the underdog characters
who may not have necessarily had a higher level of education and are of the
working class. Despite living in the barrio, they had what was called “street
smarts” and were always witty characters. They often outwitted their
Patroncito(boss) when it came to the exploitation of work. Though one of the
things that make the Rasquachi a significant character was their ability to
make do with their resources and the knowledge they have.
Now going
back to Rasquachismo, it has a similar idea in that it’s an underdog aesthetic.
Even if you come from lower class and not have every resource in the world that
you have, with the things you do have, it’s something you can work with to
produce something significant. A perfect example of how the aesthetic of
Rasquachismo being applied to is through the use of art and clothes. Reading
Davalos’ book on Yolanda Lopez, you see Lopez’s mother copying patterns from
designers and how she used inexpensive fabric to make elaborate costumes. This
idea of Rasquachismo also applies to Yolanda Lopez’s art as she finds images of
events happening around her time or uses the faces of people from articles of
photos she has and makes them into a collage to form a deeper message in her
work. Each image she uses carefully and with purpose as the context of the
images always matter to her when creating a new piece.
I would love to know what Rasquache characters you are referring to? What are some examples you can think of from television, or books?
ReplyDelete