Additionally, it was interesting to read his analysis of advertisements as being disruptive in the ways that people often perceive graffiti to be disruptive. While graffiti and advertisements take up space in similar ways, advertisements are deemed as more official and acceptable despite them being forced into the faces of unsuspecting consumers. This discussion speaks to the legitimacy that is granted to corporations to impose their own ideas while the ideas of artists such as those who do graffiti art is stifled. On a similar note, regarding commercialization of images and of art, Bójorquez shares some of his thoughts on graffiti becoming recognized as art by official entities such as art galleries. Bójorquez believes that as graffiti does become recognized as art and moves into galleries, some of the qualities intrinsic to graffiti, such as the "raw integrity" that comes with graffiti being in the streets, becomes lost in a different setting which is not as natural given the type of art it is.
This is the blog for the UCLA Chicanx Latinx Art and Artists course offered by the Cesar E. Chavez Department of Chicanx Central American Studies (CCAS M175, also Art M184 and World Arts and Cultures M128). This course provides a historical and contemporary overview of Chicanx Latinx art production with an emphasis on painting, photography, prints, murals and activist art.
Monday, February 15, 2021
Week 7: Graffiti is Art
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Maribella, I really like how your post explained that graffiti has been commonly demonized when in reality it’s an art form that represents identity, unity, and dignity. Graffiti is often associated with rebellious youth and gangs but it also represents someone leaving their mark so they will never be forgotten. The art form of graffiti will continue to grow and will never end as new generations participate.
ReplyDelete